Reeves v. Fayette SCI’s Empirical Analysis
897 F.3d 154 · 2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Schlup v. Delo · Marks v. United States · Herrera v. Collins · Calderon v. Thompson · House v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'evidence is new only if it was not available at trial and could not have been discovered earlier through the exercise of due diligence.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Skaggs v. State“actual innocence can be shown by relying on newly presented— not just newly discovered—evidence of innocence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Skaggs v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.