Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 F.3d 99 - Berg v. Kelly

Berg v. Kelly’s Empirical Analysis

897 F.3d 99 · 2018

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
December 2023
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently December 2023

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

4020182020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he district court dismissed the protesters' claims against Raymond Kelly, Commissioner of the N.Y.P.D., and Joseph Esposito, Chief of Department of the N.Y.P.D. Because the protesters' complaint barely mentioned these defendants, and neither was present at the protest, the district court concluded the protesters' claims against these officers failed as a matter of law. It also dismissed the protesters' state law claims as duplicative of its federal claims. Neither of these rulings are at issue on this appeal .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “The decision of the district court denying the Officers qualified immunity is reversed. The case is remanded with instructions to dismiss the complaint with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Our cases make clear that an arresting officer's state of mind (except for the facts that he knows) is irrelevant to the existence of probable cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.