Puckett v. Cornelson’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2017
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Hamid v. Sew Original · Chamberlin v. Chamberlin · CITY NATL. BANK & TRUST CO. v. Owens · Holbert v. Echeverria · Eckel v. Adair
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An action to recover for labor or services rendered constitutes a claim at law, while an action against a corporate officer or shareholder to recover on a corporate debt stands purely in equity.... While the trial court granted judgment to [plaintiff] on his legal claim for labor and services rendered against [corporation], the trial court granted judgment to [shareholder] on [plaintiff's] equitable claim to impose liability for the corporate debt on [shareholder] individually, and we find no authority authorizing an equitable award of attorney fees absent evidence of clearly wanton, vexatious, malicious or other like egregious conduct.... [Wle therefore conclude the trial court erred in granting attorney fees to [shareholder] as prevailing party on [plaintiff's] equitable claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“... [Wle recognize that Oklahoma law treats a corporation as a legal entity separate from its shareholder, and ordinarily shields corporate officers, directors and shareholders from personal liability for corporate debt.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.