Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 P.2d 769 - Brody v. Bock

Brody v. Bock’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
3
states following
July 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently July 2025 · most notably Town of Alma v. AZCO Construction, Inc. (2000), United International Holdings, Inc. v. Wharf (Holdings) Ltd. (2000)

5 federal appellate · 5 district · 38 state decisions

2301995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McGlasson v. Barger · Kempter v. Hurd · Kiely v. St. Germain · Woodco v. Lindahl · Herbert P. Caplan v. John H. Roberts

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “knowingly [made] a false representation.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. Peterson v. USAA Life Ins. Co. · Wisehart v. Meganck
  2. “A final judgment is a jurisdictional prerequisite to review on appeal. People v. Proffitt, 865 P.2d 929, 931 (Colo.App.1993). Generally, a trial court's dismissal of a claim without prejudice does not constitute a final judgment for purposes of appeal because the factual and legal issues underlying the dispute have not been resolved. C.R.C.P. 41(a)(2); District 50 Metro. Recreation Dist. v. Burnside, 157 Colo. 183, 186-87 , 401 P.2d 833, 835 (1965); Norby v. Charnes, [ supra ].”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. FSDW, LLC v. First National Bank · FSDW, LLC v. First Nat. Bank
  3. “[1] that the defendant made a false representation of a material fact; [2] that the party making the representation knew it was false; [3] that the party to whom the representation was made did not know of the falsity; [4] that the representation was made with the intent that it be acted upon; and [5] that the representation resulted in damages.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
    e.g. 569 F. Supp. 2d 1135 - Wood v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co. · Warder Bennett Charles Blalock Leonard Garrett Robert Hannah Ernest Howard John McMinimee Julia Simpson v. Coors Brewing Company

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.