People v. Calder’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently June 2018
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Calder v. Job · State Ex Rel. Nebraska State Bar Ass'n v. Radosevich · In Re Calder · People v. Mattox · In Re Dreier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“At the conclusion of proceedings brought under this Rule, the Hearing Board shall issue a decision imposing the same discipline as was imposed by the foreign jurisdiction, unless it is determined by the Hearing Board that: (1) The procedure followed in the foreign jurisdiction did not comport with requirements of due process of law; (2) The proof upon which the foreign jurisdiction based its determination of misconduct is so infirm that the Hearing Board cannot, consistent with its duty, accept as final the determination of the foreign jurisdiction; (3) The imposition by the Hearing Board of the same discipline as was imposed in the foreign jurisdiction would result in grave injustice; or (4) The misconduct proved warrants that a substantially different form of discipline be imposed by the Hearing Board.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Muto · People v. Apker“final adjudication in another jurisdiction of misconduct constituting grounds for discipline ... conclusively establish[es] such misconduct”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Gargano“(alt the conclusion of proceedings brought under this Rule, the Hearing Board shall issue a decision,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Gargano
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.