Peters v. Hortman’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 430 So. 2d 51 - Lamb v. Lamb · 844 So. 2d 339 - Robles v. ExxonMobile · 845 So. 2d 498 - Thomas v. Fina Oil and Chemical Co. · 449 So. 2d 1047 - Dural v. City of Morgan City · 769 So. 2d 742 - Morrison v. Dillard Dept. Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to produce factual support sufficient to establish that [she] will be able to satisfy [her] evidentiary burden of proof at trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]o allow the judgment below to stand would be to permit technical pleading rules to triumph over/actual justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.