Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2016
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 728 So. 2d 565 - Kirksey v. State · 648 So. 2d 63 - Smith v. State · 738 So. 2d 271 - Jones v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If newly discovered evidence would likely produce a different result and the proponent shows that the evidencé was discovered since the plea, that it could not have been discovered before the plea by the exercise of due diligence, that it is material to the issue, and that it is not merely cumulative, or impeaching, then such evidence justifies a successive challenge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.