Parker v. Parker’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 467 So. 2d 964 - Rudd v. Rudd · 892 So. 2d 395 - McMurphy v. East Bay Clothiers · 710 So. 2d 454 - Nichols v. Ingram Plumbing · 827 So. 2d 804 - Overy v. Murphy · 726 So. 2d 698 - Humphries v. Humphries
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““the full time fixed for filing a notice of appeal shall be computed from the date of the entry in the civil docket of an order granting or denying such motion. If such post-judgment motion is deemed denied under the provisions of Rule 59.1 of the Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure, then the time for filing a notice of appeal shall be computed from the date of denial of such motion by operation of law, as provided for in Rule 59.1.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. McAfee v. Garrison
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.