Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

897 So. 2d 545

Sinclair v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-03-16

Relies on Seabrooks v. State

Decided 2005-03-16

PER CURIAM.

¶1Affirmed. See Cooper v. State, 817 So.2d 934 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (holding that a claim that a notice of intent to habitualize is not sufficiently specific must be raised in a Rule 3.850 motion).

/897/so2d/545 · .json · Public domain