State v. Frey’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2005
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Boyd v. Brown · State v. Reese · State v. Grim · State v. Dulany · State v. Bernard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The corroboration rule does not apply when the inconsistencies or contradictions in the victim’s trial testimony involved proof not essential to the case. State v. Gardner, 849 S.W.2d 602, 604 (Mo.App. 1993). The inconsistencies regarding the precise time, the clothing she was wearing, and other minor details, do not involve contradictions or inconsistencies that ‘go directly to an essential element of the state’s case’.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Pierce
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.