Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 SW2D 374 - Joseph v. State

Joseph v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
3
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably Poindexter v. State (2005), Hyett v. State (2001)

33 state decisions

130199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Geesa v. State · Johnson v. State · Martin v. State · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “requir[e] the controlled substance to be visible to the naked eye in order to support appellant's conviction. Visibility is not an element of the offense of possession of a controlled substance.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[P]ossession of the container in which the [controlled] substance is found is not, itself, sufficient to prove a knowing possession.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.