Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 897 SW2D 812 - Walker v. State

Walker v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2019

16 state decisions

90199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Patterson v. State · Berry v. State · Tyra v. State · Walker v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We therefore hold that the operation of an automobile may constitute the use of a deadly weapon under a prosecution under § 19.05(a)(2). We further hold that no intent to use the automobile as a weapon need be shown.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “did use or exhibit a deadly weapon, to-wit: an automobile that in the manner of its use or intended use was capable of causing death or serious bodily injury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.