In Re EB’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on In re M.L. · In Re DA · In Re Lowry · In the Interest of H.S.W.C.-B & S.E.C.-B · In Re Ex Rel. H.S.W.C.-B & S.E.C.-B
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We accord great weight to [the fact-finding] function of the hearing judge because he is in the position to observe and rule upon the credibility of the witnesses and the parties who appear before him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re FB
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.