Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 1218 - United States v. Pace

United States v. Pace’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 1218 · 1990

Citation profile

200
cited by 200 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
17
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

129 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 200 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2024 · most notably Florida v. Tyvessel Tyvorus White (1999), United States v. Crawford (2005)

129 federal appellate · 3 district · 24 state decisions — followed in 17 states

12401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3013 · 21 U.S.C. § 848 (§ 408 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 853 (§ 413 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 881 (§ 511 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Illinois v. Gates · Anderson v. City of Bessemer City · Carroll v. United States · Franks v. Delaware

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 200 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A statute increasing the penalty for conspiracy does not violate the ex post facto clause when applied to a conspiracy begun before the increase that continued on after the increase.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A home's 'curtilage' is the area outside the home itself but so close to and intimately connected with the home and the activities that normally go on there that it can reasonably be considered part of the home.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[W]here police have probable cause to believe a car is subject to forfeiture, or have validly seized a car for forfeiture, the polic[e] may search the car without a warrant.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.