Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

898 F.2d 144

Docket No. 89-6740.

Albert Russell Clay, Jr. v. Bill R. Overman, Sheriff, City of Virginia Beach

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Nov. 17, 1989. Decided: March 1, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-03-01

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently January 1994

23 federal appellate ·

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-03-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-232-N)

Albert Russell Clay, Jr., appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS, Circuit Judge, and HARRISON L. WINTER and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Albert Russell Clay, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Clay v. Overman, C/A No. 89-232-N (E.D.Va. Apr. 20 and June 23, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

DISMISSED.

/898/f2d/144 · .json · Public domain