Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

898 F.2d 145

Docket No. 89-6732.

Haynes v. Waters

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Oct. 30, 1989. Decided: March 2, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-03-02

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2006

1 district ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on James v. O'Mally

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-03-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Chief District Judge. (C/A No. 88-281-AM)

Calvin Haynes, appellant pro se.

Gary A. Bryant, Wilcox & Savage, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Calvin Haynes appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Haynes v. Waters, C/A No. 88-281-AM (E.D.Va. June 26, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/898/f2d/145 · .json · Public domain