Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

898 F.2d 145

Docket No. 89-7820.

Holley v. Goldbrick

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Dec. 29, 1989. Decided: Feb. 26, 1990. Rehearing and Rehearing In Banc Denied March 22, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-02-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on James v. O'Mally

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-02-26

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Joseph C. Howard, District Judge. (C/A No. 89-341-JH)

Robert Holley, appellant pro se.

Robert Charles Verderaime, Verderaime and Dubois, Baltimore, Maryland, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Robert Holley appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Goldbrick, C/A 89-341-JH (D.Md. August 25, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/898/f2d/145 · .json · Public domain