Kloepfer’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently May 2017 · most notably United States v. Markum (1993), Patton v. TIC United Corp. (1996)
5 federal appellate · 10 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Sloan v. Hicks · Salem v. United States Lines Company · Bourjaily v. United States · Ford v. Wainwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the proffered reports were not limited to three-wheeled vehicles, did not relate to an investigation into this accident or to the Honda model involved herein, but rather accidents, injuries and statistics involving all-terrain vehicles manufactured by over twenty manufacturers.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A trial judge has broad discretion in determining the competency of an expert witness.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a real possibility that the jury would give undue deference to such evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.