NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frank A. Kaufman, Senior District Judge. (C/A No. 85-2968-K)
Edar Y. Rogler, appellant pro se.
Carmen Mercedes Shepard, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, for appellees.
D.Md., 126 F.R.D. 509.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Edar Y. Rogler appeals from the district court's order denying relief in her employment discrimination action filed under Title VII and 42 U.S.C. Secs. 1981 and 1983. We have granted appellant's motion for enlargement of time and have considered her supplemental briefs. Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Rogler v. Phillips Bldg. Mental Retardation Program, CA-85-2968-K (D.Md. June 15, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.