Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

898 F.2d 148

Docket No. 89-7155.

United States v. Fox

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Dec. 28, 1989. Decided: Feb. 27, 1990.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1990-02-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. William George, A/K/A Pee Wee

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1990-02-27

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Shelby. Woodrow Wilson Jones, District Judge. (CR Nos. 86-36-SH, 86-62-SH; C/A No. 88-291-C-SH)

James Larry Fox, appellant pro se.

Max Oliver Cogburn, Jr., Office of the United States Attorney, for appellee.

W.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge, and HARRISON L. WINTER and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James Larry Fox appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Fox, CR Nos. 86-36-SH, 86-62-SH; C/A No. 88-291-C-SH (W.D.N.C. May 1, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2

AFFIRMED.

/898/f2d/148 · .json · Public domain