Newman v. Teigeler’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.2d 1574 · 1990
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8341
Relies on Marchetti v. United States · Rector Etc of Holy Trinity Church v. United States · Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee · Mansell v. Mansell · Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. Betts
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As we have previously stated, '[t]he task of rewriting a statute is and should remain a duty reserved for Congress.' Horner v. Jeffrey, 823 F.2d 1521 , 1527 (Fed.Cir.1987) (citing Marchetti v. United States, 390 U.S. 39 , 60 n. 18, 88 S.Ct. 697, 708 n. 18, 19 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Newman v. Love
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.