Rao v. Baker’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.2d 191 · 1990
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently July 2017
9 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 717 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) · 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 706 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)
Relies on Udall v. Tallman · Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. · Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown · Idaho v. Wright · Mondy v. Secretary of the Army
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“circumstances beyond his ... control prevented the filing of a Notice of Appeal within the prescribed time limit.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority““a written statement by the complainant showing that he or she was not notified of the prescribed time limit and was not otherwise aware of it or that circumstances beyond his or her control prevented the filing of a Notice of Appeal within the prescribed time limit, [and] the Commission exercises its discretion to extend the time limit and accept the appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a rebuttable presumption that in all cases in which evidence of the actual date of receipt is lacking, the final agency decision will be deemed to have been received [five] days following the date of decision”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.