Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 3 - United States v. Pighetti

United States v. Pighetti’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 3 · 1990

Citation profile

93
cited by 93 later decisions
December 2010
most recently cited

81 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 93 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably United States v. Rivera (1993), United States v. Ruiz (1990)

81 federal appellate ·

820199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 21 U.S.C. § 846 (§ 406 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on McMillan v. Pennsylvania · Nicholas v. United States · Dorszynski v. United States · Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund v. Presti · United States v. Diaz-Villafane

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 93 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “we have no jurisdiction to review the extent of a downward departure merely because the affected defendant is dissatisfied with the quantification of the district court's generosity.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the extent of a departure, like the decision to depart itself, is essentially discretionary, ... and the statute affords no grounds for the beneficiary of a departure decision to complain that the deviation should have been greater”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “squarely and recently, that a sentencing court's decision not to depart from the guidelines is unappealable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.