Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 312 - Rodriguez Alvarez v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc.

Rodriguez Alvarez v. Bahama Cruise Line, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 312 · 1990

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
April 2015
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably Mareno v. Rowe (1990), In Re: Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq., Jerasimos Papapanayotou, Esq. v. Jeffrey Sapir, Esq., as Chapter 7 Trustee (2000)

20 federal appellate · 1 district ·

170199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on The Osceola · Sloan v. Hicks · Vaughan v. Atkinson · Padilla-Martinez v. United States · Calmar Ss Corporation v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]lthough a party [that] loses in the district court has the right to pursue any and all bona fide arguments upon appeal, the right to an appeal does not grant a party a license to clog the appellate docket by advancing meritless arguments for the sole purpose of harassing the prevailing party and subjecting it to undue time and expense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “If a court of appeals shall determine that an appeal is frivolous, it may award just damages and single or double costs to the appellee.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “may include the granting of reasonable attorneys' fees to the party forced to defend the frivolous appeal.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.