Dixie Warehouse And Cartage Company v. General Drivers, Warehousemen And Helpers, Local Union No. 89’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.2d 507 · 1990
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently June 2015 · most notably Interstate Brands Corporation Butternut Bread Division v. Chauffeurs Teamsters Warehousemen and Helpers Local Union No (1990), Bruce Hardwood Floors v. Southern Council of Industrial Workers (1993)
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc. · Eberhard Foods, Inc. v. Handy · International Brotherhood of Firemen & Oilers v. Nestle Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he Supreme Court outlined the limits of judicial review by stating: “The refusal of courts to review the merits of an arbitration award is the proper approach to arbitration under collective bargaining agreements. The federal policy of settling labor disputes by arbitration would be undermined if courts had the final say on the merits of the awards.” United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 , 4 L.Ed.2d 1424 (1960). As long as an award “draws its essence from the collective bargaining agreement” and the arbitrator does not dispense “his own brand of industrial justice,” the award is legitimate. Id. at 597 , 80 S.Ct. 1358 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[i]n the absence of a contractual provision that expressly limits or removes”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.