Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 598 - Gregory v. Ashcroft

Gregory v. Ashcroft’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 598 · 1990

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 630 (§ 11 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967) · 29 U.S.C. § 631 (§ 12 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez · United States v. Bass · Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. Murgia · Vance v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an immediate advisor with respect to the exercise of the constitutional or legal powers of [an] office.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “any person chosen by such officer to be on such officer's personal staff”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “As a preliminary matter, we note that the District Court found [the Missouri state judges], initially appointed by the Governor and retained in office by a majority of the voters as required by the Missouri Plan, to be outside the ADEA’s exception for persons “elected to public office”. Although we are inclined to disagree with this aspect of the District Court’s decision, the Governor did not cross-appeal this issue, it was not briefed by either side, and it is not properly before us. We therefore express no opinion on this point, and shall assume for the balance of this opinion that state judges selected according to the Missouri Plan are appointed and not “elected” within the meaning of the ADEA.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.