Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 642 - United States v. Carey

United States v. Carey’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 642 · 1990

Citation profile

111
cited by 111 later decisions
July 2013
most recently cited

96 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently July 2013 · most notably United States v. Moreno (1991), United States v. Aymelek (1991)

96 federal appellate ·

940199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924

Relies on United States v. Young · Isaksen v. Vermont Castings, Inc. · Nobile v. Schindler · Cordeiro v. United States · United States v. Evidente

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]f reliable information indicates that the criminal history category does not adequately reflect the seriousness of the defendant's past criminal conduct or the likelihood that the defendant will commit other crimes....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “seriousness of appellant's prior criminal history and his incorrigibility were not adequately reflected in his criminal history category or other guidelines”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “prejudices the substantial rights of the defendant and would result in a miscarriage of justice if left uncorrected.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.