Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 672 - Walker v. Rushing

Walker v. Rushing’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 672 · 1990

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
3
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2025

10 federal appellate · 3 district · 4 state decisions

1401990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1112 · 18 U.S.C. § 1153 · 18 U.S.C. § 1162 · 25 U.S.C. § 1303 (§ 203 of the Indian Civil Rights Act of 1968) · 25 U.S.C. § 1323

Relies on United States v. Wheeler · Keeble v. United States · McClanahan v. State Tax Commission of Arizona · White Mountain Apache Tribe v. Bracker · Samuel Worcester v. The State of Georgia

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[n]othing in the wording of Public Law 280 or its legislative history precludes concurrent tribal authority”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.