Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 69 - Alerte v. McGinnis

Alerte v. McGinnis’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.2d 69 · 1990

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
February 2000
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Browder v. Director Department of Corrections of Illinois · Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co. · Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co. · United States v. Indrelunas · Acosta v. Louisiana Department of Health and Human Resources

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the graveyard of an inordinate number of appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “is not worth the paper it is written on.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.