Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.2d 849 - United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
January 2016
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2016 · most notably In Re Initial Public Offering Securities Litigation. (2006), Caridad v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad (1999)

4 federal appellate · 4 district · 1 state decisions

200199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bell v. Wolfish · Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla. · Nicholas v. United States · Adamson v. Bowen · Randolph-Sheppard Vendors of America v. Weinberger

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the IFRP program serves valid penalogical interests and is fully consistent with the BOP's authorization, under the direction of the Attorney General, to provide for rehabilitation and reformation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Provided that the district court has applied the proper legal standards in deciding whether to certify a class, its decision may only be overturned if it constitutes an abuse of discretion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “alleged coercive tactics used to collect fines”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.