In re Williams’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.3d 1098 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 2119 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 1254 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Slack v. McDaniel · Barefoot v. Estelle · Polk County v. Dodson · 135 S. Ct. 2551 - Johnson v. United States · Felker v. Turpin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contain[s] ... a new rule of constitutional law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously unavailable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“often consider briefing from the government before issuing a published order; some also entertain oral argument from both parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall not be appealable and shall not be the subject of a petition for rehearing or for a writ of certiorari.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.