Lassend v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.3d 115 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 8 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 16 · 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 921 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 922 (Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Shepard v. United States · United States v. Frady · Engle v. Isaac · Russello v. United States · Bousley v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he prejudice inquiry dovetails with the merits inquiry.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“may petition for post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (a) if, inter alia, the individual's sentence 'was imposed in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States' or 'is otherwise subject to collateral attack.'”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“When reviewing a district court's denial of a § 2255 petition, we review the district court's legal conclusions de novo and any factual findings for clear error.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.