Singh v. Sessions’s Empirical Analysis
898 F.3d 720 · 2018
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1227 (§ 237 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Abudu · Leocal v. Ashcroft · 23 I. & N. Dec. 621 - PICKERING · 134 S. Ct. 870 - Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. · Ceron v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was made without a rational explanation, inexplicably departed from established policies, or rested on an impermissible basis, such as invidious discrimination against a race or particular group.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Vyloha v. Barr“[s]tatutory words and phrases are given their ordinary meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.