Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 F.3d 760 - United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

898 F.3d 760 · 2018

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)

Relies on United States v. Carroll · United States v. Thompson · United States v. Caliendo · United States v. Renteria · United States v. Wolfe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'special deference,' because only 'in an extreme case are appellate judges competent to second-guess the judgment of the person on the spot, the trial judge.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.