State v. Willis’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
March 2018
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3664
Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · State v. Aragon · 134 S. Ct. 1854 - Robers v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An offender may challenge restitution, but must do so by requesting a hearing within 30 days of receiving written notification of the amount of restitution requested.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. State“[I]f the defendant challenges the restitution amount sought, the statute requires the court to conduct a restitution hearing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Howard v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.