Hill v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently May 2020
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rakas v. Illinois · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Kercheval v. United States · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth Ranch
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Lacking any direct evidence Appellant actually possessed either the cocaine or the gun, the State must prove he constructively possessed each.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“In Oklahoma a defendant bears the burden to provide a sufficient record upon which this Court may determine the issue raised.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. BRAMLETT v. STATE
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.