898 So. 2d 1021 - Rosecan v. Springer’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “Remands are for the purpose of correcting the error which resulted in the reversal of a judgment. The trial court's discretion upon remand is limited by the scope of the relief granted. See Akins v. Akins, 839 So.2d 910, 911 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). Needless to say, the trial court exceeded its authority on remand in this case.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 985 So. 2d 607 - Rosecan v. Springer

2. “Upon this remand, the court should determine the amount of passive income to be attributed to those assets, add that to at least the minimum income of $130,000 and determine what difference, if any, results. The court should then determine what alimony, if any, is warranted.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 985 So. 2d 607 - Rosecan v. Springer

3. “On remand, the trial court, without any new evidence, attempted to rework its original findings in order to award the same amount of alimony we reversed in our prior opinion.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 985 So. 2d 607 - Rosecan v. Springer