Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

898 So. 2d 1208

Rivera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-04-13

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 2016

5 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2005-04-13

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the revocation of appellant’s probation. The State concedes that the sentencing order contains an apparent scrivener’s error since the trial court credited the appellant with all time previously served in prison on the original split-sentence for counts I-IV, but unlike the prison credit blocks on the sentencing order for counts I — III, the prison credit block for count IV was not checked.1 We therefore remand to the trial court to correct this error.

¶2Affirmed and remanded for correction of the sentencing order.

FARMER, C.J., STONE and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

¶3. The prison credit block reads:

"It is further ordered that the defendant be allowed credit for all time previously served on this count in the Department of Corrections prior to sentencing.”
/898/so2d/1208 · .json · Public domain