¶1Affirmed. Miller v. Scobie, 152 Fla. 328, 11 So.2d 892, 894 (1943)(“We do not deny the right of litigants to settle controversies out of court but any such settlement without the knowledge or notice to counsel and the payment of their fees is fraud on them whether there was an intent to do so or not.”); Knott v. Knott, 395 So.2d 1196, 1199 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Young v. Young, 322 So.2d 594, 596 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975).
898 So. 2d 1216
Rose v. Rose
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 20, 2005
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2005-04-20
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently August 2006
2 state decisions
Relies on Miller v. Scobie · 395 So. 2d 1196 - Knott v. Knott · 322 So. 2d 594 - Young v. Young
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 2005-04-20
View the full empirical analysis of this case →