Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 898 So. 2d 266 - Baskin v. State

898 So. 2d 266 - Baskin v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2005

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 2007
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 414 So. 2d 509 - Williams v. State · Jakouch v. State · Lawley v. State · 683 So. 2d 1093 - Madrigal v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is improper for a successor judge to sentence a defendant unless the record shows that the substitution of judges is necessary or dictated by an emergency.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “sufficiently precise that it fairly apprised the trial court of the relief sought and the grounds therefor.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.