State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1995
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2017
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Green v. United States · United States v. Jorn · Crist v. Bretz · American Plant Food Corporation v. State · Studer v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“before the date on which the trial on the merits commences.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner · Sanchez v. State“We recognized that in the past limitations was considered a jurisdictional issue. If an indictment was not presented within the limitation period, the trial court did not have jurisdiction; therefore, that defect could be raised at any time. But with the passage of the amendments to Article V, § 12 of the Texas Constitution and article 1.14(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, it is clear that jurisdiction is conferred by the presentment of the charging instrument, even if it appears from the fact of the instrument there is a limitations problem. We concluded that “an indictment still confers jurisdiction upon the trial court, such that the defendant must bring the defect to the attention of the trial court in order to preserve any error.” Id, Accordingly, the Legislature has decided that a limitations allegation in an indictment no longer has jurisdictional implications.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Turner“Court of Appeals assumed that the day of trial was the date on which appellee's motion to dismiss was filed [and that] [n]either party dispute[d] the Court of Appeal's assumption as to the date of trial or contend[ed] that this was not `the date on which the trial commenced' for purposes of article 1.14(b).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Sanchez v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.