State v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““In determining the sufficiency of the evidence, we accept as true all evidence favorable to the verdict, including all favorable inferences drawn from the evidence and disregard contrary evidence and inferences. State v. Sladek, 835 S.W.2d 308, 310 (Mo. banc 1992). We do not weigh the evidence. State v. Villa-Perez, 835 S.W.2d 897, 900 (Mo. banc 1992). We do not determine credibility of the witnesses. State v. Middleton, 854 S.W.2d 504, 506 (Mo.App.1993).””

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. White

2. “The established rule is that ownership of stolen property may be established either by the actual owners, ... or the one rightfully in possession, ... and a showing that the property was taken from the one who had charge and control of the property. State v. McCoy 647 S.W.2d 862, 864 (Mo. App.1983). The lawful control and custody of property is a sufficient attribute of ownership to support the claim and proof of ownership. Id.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. White