Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 899 F.2d 649 - Mansfield v. Paxon

Mansfield v. Paxon’s Empirical Analysis

899 F.2d 649 · 1990

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2003
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Yamanis v. United States · Midlantic National Bank v. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection · American National Bank & Trust Co. v. Bailey · Curtis v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · 169 Mich. App. 540 - Transamerica Insurance Corp. of America v. Buckley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “silent party plaintiff ... so that the jury would not award the named plaintiff a lesser sum, knowing that he had already been reimbursed by” that insurance company. Id. at 650-51 . Unlike the insurance company in Mansfield , Old Republic would not be asserting any claims against anyone or otherwise acting as a formal party raising or defending against any claims, and would clearly not be acting as a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.