Jones v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.2d 883 · 1990
Citation profile
59 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 85 later decisions — most recently May 2015 · most notably United States v. Baker (1993), Duckett v. Godinez (1995)
59 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carnegie v. United States · Illinois v. Allen · Scharffe v. Perkins · Garrett v. United States · 16 Cal. 3d 282 - People v. Duran
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“or, more precisely, harms, include (1) reversal of the presumption of innocence, (2) impairment of the defendant's mental ability, (3) impeding of communication between the defendant and his counsel, (4) detraction from the decorum of the trial, and (5) pain. Id.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“First the court must be persuaded by compelling circumstances 'that some measure was needed to maintain the security of the courtroom.' Second, the court must 'pursue less restrictive alternatives before imposing physical restraints.'”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Peaslee v. Maass · Logan v. Gomez S“must be persuaded by compelling circumstances 'that some measure [is] needed to maintain the security of the courtroom.' Second, the court must 'pursue less restrictive alternatives before imposing physical restraints.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.