In re Power Integrations, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.3d 1316 · 2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 311 · 5 U.S.C. § 555 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · Roche v. Evaporated Milk Ass'n · Cheney v. United States District Court for District of Columbia · Cuozzo Speed Technologies, LLC v. Lee · SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We have held that the statutory prohibition on appeals from decisions not to institute inter partes review cannot be sidestepped simply by styling the request for review as a petition for mandamus”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.