Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 899 F.3d 420 - Kelso v. Butler

Kelso v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis

899 F.3d 420 · 2018

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2111

Relies on Kotteakos v. United States · Neder v. United States · Fontenot v. Upjohn Co. · Shinseki, Secretary of Veterans Affairs v. Sanders · Benchmark Electronics, Inc. v. J.M. Huber Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable jury would not have a legally sufficient evidentiary basis to find for the party on that issue.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.