United States v. Farah’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.3d 608 · 2018
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1111 · 18 U.S.C. § 2339B (§ 303 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3553 · 18 U.S.C. § 956 · 20 U.S.C. § 1097
Relies on Gall v. United States · Quirin Haupt Kerling Burger Heinck Thiel Neubauer United States Quirin v. Cox Usa 6 · Elonis v. United States · United States v. Johnson · United States v. Johnson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“review[s] a district court's formulation of jury instructions for an abuse of discretion and its interpretation of law de novo .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“does not warrant reversal of a conviction if it is harmless.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.