Stevens v. Corelogic, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.3d 666 · 2018
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from California Southern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 17 U.S.C. § 1202 (§ 103 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 17 U.S.C. § 512 (§ 202 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1821
Relies on Astoria Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Solimino · Corley v. United States · Hibbs Director Arizona Department of Revenue v. Winn et al. · Inhabitants of the Township of Montclair County of Essex v. Ramsdell · Margolis v. Ryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“make an affirmative showing, such as by demonstrating a past 'pattern of conduct' or 'modus operandi,' that the defendant was aware or had reasonable grounds to be aware of the probable future impact of its action.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“knowledge, or...having reasonable grounds to know”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.