Henry v. Spearman’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.3d 703 · 2018
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc. · Carafas v. J · Begay v. United States · Maynard v. Cartwright
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a judicially imagined 'ordinary case' of a crime,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“The requirement of a mere prima facie showing [in an application for leave to file a second or successive petition] 'render[s] irrelevant other possible grounds for dismissal such as ultimate lack of merit, nonexhaustion, procedural default, and the like.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Turner v. Baker“is burglary, arson, or extortion, involves use of explosives, or otherwise involves conduct that presents a serious potential risk of physical injury to another .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. In re White
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.