Arce v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
899 F.3d 796 · 2018
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2675 · 6 U.S.C. § 202 · 8 U.S.C. § 1101 (§ 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1231 (§ 241 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Enrico St Cyr · Janet Reno, Attorney General v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee et al. · Nken v. Holder · Clark Field Office Director Seattle Immigration and Customs Enforcement et al. v. Martinez · Jennings v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claim that the Attorney General should have exercised discretion to delay [a] removal”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“totally lack[ed] the [statutory] discretion to effectuate a removal order.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he limitation on jurisdiction .... applies to ' any cause or claim by or on behalf of any alien' that arises from a decision to execute a removal order, so it was unnecessary for Congress to enumerate every possible cause or claim.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.